From 0cc916b602b59ea873ea4ba8e1e11d03acba1bf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Day Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 09:57:45 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update: Change the wording to make more sense. --- news/2022_06_04-librem_to_freedom.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/news/2022_06_04-librem_to_freedom.html b/news/2022_06_04-librem_to_freedom.html index ebe814e..d3df99d 100644 --- a/news/2022_06_04-librem_to_freedom.html +++ b/news/2022_06_04-librem_to_freedom.html @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ EOF The Librem5 is in a bit of an awkward position. The Purism company, from how things appear to me, are marketing towards a security towards an average person using software and tools from a highly technical field.

- The current day less-technical person from the traditional more-technical person have very different use cases. I have never owned one of these proprietary Android or Apple phones. Having said that, I believe that the interface is focused towards such an audience. I find such an interface tolerable but not very user-friendly. + The current day less-technical person compared to the traditional more-technical person have very different use cases. I have never owned one of these proprietary Android or Apple phones. Having said that, I believe that the interface is focused towards such an audience. I find such an interface tolerable but not very user-friendly.

I believe what the Librem5 provides achieves this with the exception of pictures. This exception is so big, that I might better word this as calling it the rule rather than the exception. Taking, sending, and receiving pictures is the bread and butter of the average user out in the wild. The Librem5 (and also the Pinephone for that matter) drops the ball on this. This is a major downside and I would argue is a requirement that should be immediately address, two years ago. -- 1.8.3.1